“Lincoln” is mildly mistitled… It is not a Lincoln biopic.

Instead, the film specifically examines the passage of the 13th Amendment to the Constitution, which permanently abolished slavery. Certainly Lincoln is the primary character, but the movie features an enormous cast and focuses not on the life of the man but on the action in Congress surrounding the passage of the surprisingly controversial amendment.

Regardless, Daniel Day-Lewis gives a biopic performance for the ages, completely bringing our common image of Lincoln to life. And for a movie revolving around legislative action, “Lincoln” manages to be intense, moving, spirited and surprisingly humorous.

The action of Lincoln revolves almost entirely around the highly contested, hard-fought passage of the 13th Amendment to the Constitution, which outlawed slavery and involuntary servitude.

With a limited knowledge of history, I suppose my presumption had been that the 13th amendment would have passed with – at the least – overwhelming support, if not complete unanimity. It’s hard from the modern-day viewpoint to imagine people resisting such a fundamental right. Freedom. The abolition of slavery – now – seems like such an obvious, enlightened choice to make that its difficult to imagine how or why it might be opposed. I think the common, simplified perception is that “The North” – all of “The North” – wanted to abolish slavery. Thus, the fact that it wasn’t universally supported becomes fascinating in its own right.

One of the fundamental objections to the amendment, and one that makes a certain amount of sense (hear me out) is that certain representatives opposed abolishing slavery at that moment because doing so might prolong the war. If the Southern States knew for certain that slavery would be outlawed by the time they rejoined the Union, they might continue to fight longer, and at that point in time they were precipitously close to surrendering. With so much blood being spilled, any extension of hostilities was something to be avoided. Lincoln and his political allies knew, however, that if they didn’t pass the amendment prior to the South rejoining the country, it may not pass for years or, perhaps ever. They were having trouble getting the act passed without the Southern States voting against it. The fight for freedom needed to be finished before the fighting actually stopped.

Thus, the passage of the amendment comes equipped with a ticking clock. As the South makes peace overtures, Lincoln tries to stall and keep their attempts at parlay secret. Behind the scenes, he buys votes, calls in favors, and makes promises. His allies on the floor (notably Tommy Lee Jones in an enjoyably cantankerous turn) are forced to tone down their actual beliefs about equality in order to appear moderate to those who were racially opposed to the bill. Because of course, the finality of the war isn’t the only objection to the Amendment. There are outright racist sentiments as well. Representatives who believe and proclaim that “the Negro is inferior” or that slaves aren’t ready for freedom, that it would overwhelm them. “Lincoln” never lets us forget what exactly was at stake.

Spielberg has created a fascinating movie here. It’s a highly entertaining historical drama, peppered with a surprising amount of humor. For the most part, he keeps his heavy-handed tendencies at bay. With a few scattered exceptions, he focuses on letting the story and characters do the work, and lays off of the sweeping music, the heavy symbolism and the maudlin sentimentality. What we’re given is a solid, believable film focusing on an engrossing moment in history, re-enacted by a highly talented troupe of performers.

The cast is sprawling, yet filled with accomplished actors. Hal Holbrook, David Stathairn, Bruce McGill, Jared Harris, and Walton Goggins all show up for cameo sized appearances. James Spader and John Hawkes have more sizeable supporting roles as vote hunters. Joseph Gordon-Levitt stops by for a few pointed scenes as Robert Lincoln, in order to showcase the personal impact of the war. Given large parts and truly standing out with them are Tommy Lee Jones and Sally Field. This may be one of Tommy Lee Jones’ most ornery roles (and that’s saying something), he’s great, here. And Sally Fields turns in a fiery role as Mary Todd Lincoln. She’s truly very animated as the President’s wife… alternately giving him grief and counsel as the woman behind the great man.

But the film belongs to Daniel Day-Lewis.

Day-Lewis gives us one of the most mesmerizing biopic performances ever in this film. He takes our commonly imagined Abraham Lincoln, and breathes life into him onscreen. Lincoln walks and talks, as surely as if Spielberg had gotten a time machine, à la “Bill and Ted”. Day-Lewis is as certain for an Academy Award nomination as anything can be at the 2012 Oscars, it’s a near absolute certainty. His Lincoln is a storyteller and humorist, a patient leader, but not afraid to get tough or fight dirty. He’s weary from the burdens he’s faced in office, yet determined to do the difficult things that lay ahead. It’s an absolutely captivating performance, and destined to be mentioned alongside Ben Kingsley’s Mahatma Gandhi and Jamie Foxx’s Ray Charles as one of the most incredible biopic roles of our times.

With surprising historical events, incredible performances by an “embarrassment of riches” cast, and unexpected levels of humor and charm, “Lincoln” is a very entertaining, solidly composed film. It will undoubtedly add to the already formidable legacies of both Daniel Day-Lewis and Steven Spielberg.


60 thoughts on “Lincoln

  1. I enjoyed this one, but it’s a heck load of information to absorb, so one shouldn’t watch it while tired. Or if they’re easily bored. I really appreciate the great humour. My favourite line is probably (at least by Lincoln, everything Tommy Lee Jones’ character said was great), “I’m sorry, I know my sermons should be shorter, but when I get going, I get too lazy to stop.” Actually, I was anticipating this but, oddly, I had my doubts about seeing it a few days before it came out – and then I saw a trailer and Lincoln said that line, and I just though, okay… I have to see this opening day!

    Great review though 🙂

      • I’m not familiar with American history or anything, I understood most of the basics, but I just had to think about it a little at times. Thanks for checking my review out, though! Yeah, I was a little tired. It was quite fascinating!

  2. Excellent write-up Fogs. It’s great to hear all the love for Day-Lewis. I haven’t heard a bad word about him. As a personal favourite of mine, I hope he gets the Oscar and I haven’t even seen the film yet.

  3. Pingback: LAMBscores: The Assassination of Abraham Lincoln by the (Not-So) Coward James Bond | The Large Association of Movie Blogs

  4. Finally got to see this (on the big screen still!) and absolutely loved it. Brilliant performances all around, especially Day-Lewis, who completely disapeared into his role. There was no point whatsoever in the movie when I thought that the person on the screen was anyone other than Abraham Lincoln. And you’re right that this was in no way a Biopic, but rather a gripping political thriller which featured Lincoln as the main mover and shaker of this moment in history.
    I was also very impressed by the overall caliober of the acting throughout. Much has been made of Day-Lewis and Fields and Jones, but the whole cast really worked. Spielberg has never really been known as an ‘Actor’s’ director, but he got some amazing performances out of a lot of these actors. Also I was very impressed with John William’s score, which while moving and powerful, was not as bombastic or omnipresent as many of his can be.

    So, while maybe not a film for kids (My teenaged niece and nephew were bored spitless), the wife and I really enjoyed it. Not sure where it’ll land in oscar land, but I can certainly see noms for Best actor, supporting actor, supporting actress, score, directing, cinematography, editing, and sound, I’m not sure if it’ll get tapped for best pic too. It could happen, but its a tough field this year. I am semi-reliably informed that the academy is leaning towards Zero Dark Thirty, a film which has surprisingly not opened in DC yet.

    • Pfft, hasn’t opened anywhere yet, the bastards… I’m sure you’re well aware that that’s a sore subject for me. LOL

      Yeah, will it WIN best picture? I can easily see it NOT winning, let’s say that. It is freaking serious Oscar Bait though, aint it? I think it definitely gets noms all over the place though, for sure. I havent seen Zero Dark (obviously), so I cant comment, but even without that, Lincoln is on the edge of my top ten as it is…

      Youre right though. Great great acting, obviously an important story, and for the most part, Spielberg kept out of his own way. LOL. 😀

      Glad you dug it!

Join in the discussion!

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s